Rollup of 7 pull requests #77272
Merged
Rollup of 7 pull requests #77272
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This used to happen as a side-effect of `is_min_const_fn`, which was subtle.
This should be caught by the new check in `rustc_passes`. At some point, this function will be removed entirely.
This patch also: * Add soft-float supports: only f32 * zero-extend i8/i16 to i32 because MIPS only supports register-length arithmetic. * Update table in asm! chapter in unstable book.
This mis-highlighted the entire documentation as code.
…separate lints This is not ideal because it means `deny(broken_intra_doc_links)` will no longer `deny(private_intra_doc_links)`. However, it can't be fixed with a new lint group, because `broken` is already in the `rustdoc` lint group; there would need to be a way to nest groups somehow. This also removes the early `return` so that the link will be generated even though it gives a warning.
Add asm! support for MIPS For now, I only add support for mips32. mips64 may come in future PRs if I could learn more about the target.
…r=oli-obk Check for missing const-stability attributes in `rustc_passes` Currently, this happens as a side effect of `is_min_const_fn`, which is non-obvious. Also adds a test for this case, since we didn't seem to have one before.
Separate `private_intra_doc_links` and `broken_intra_doc_links` into separate lints This is not ideal because it means `deny(broken_intra_doc_links)` will no longer `deny(private_intra_doc_links)`. However, it can't be fixed with a new lint group, because `broken` is already in the `rustdoc` lint group; there would need to be a way to nest groups somehow. This also removes the early `return` so that the link will be generated even though it gives a warning. r? @Manishearth cc @ecstatic-morse (#77242 (comment))
reduce overlong line
Fix typo in ExpnData documentation This mis-highlighted the entire documentation as code: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_span/hygiene/struct.ExpnData.html#structfield.krate
Remove duplicate comment
Clean up trivial if let
|
📌 Commit 344ab3f has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
rustc_passes#77203 (Check for missing const-stability attributes inrustc_passes)private_intra_doc_linksandbroken_intra_doc_linksinto separate lints #77249 (Separateprivate_intra_doc_linksandbroken_intra_doc_linksinto separate lints)Failed merges:
r? @ghost