Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for CloudABI targets to the rustc backend. #46940

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 26, 2017

Conversation

EdSchouten
Copy link
Contributor

CloudABI is a sandboxed UNIX-like runtime environment. It is a
programming environment that uses a capability-based security model. In
practice this means that many POSIX interfaces are present, except for
ones that try to access resources out of thin air. For example, open()
is gone, but openat() is present.

Right now I'm at the point where I can compile very basic CloudABI
applications on all four supported architectures (ARM and x86, 32 and 64
bits). The next step will be to get libstd to work. Patches for that are
outside the scope of this change.

More info: https://nuxi.nl/cloudabi/ /~https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc/

CloudABI is a sandboxed UNIX-like runtime environment. It is a
programming environment that uses a capability-based security model. In
practice this means that many POSIX interfaces are present, except for
ones that try to access resources out of thin air. For example, open()
is gone, but openat() is present.

Right now I'm at the point where I can compile very basic CloudABI
applications on all four supported architectures (ARM and x86, 32 and 64
bits). The next step will be to get libstd to work. Patches for that are
outside the scope of this change.

More info: https://nuxi.nl/cloudabi/ /~https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc/
Backend definitions for these targets are present, meaning we can start
announcing this target. While there, sort the list alphabetically.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @eddyb (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Dec 22, 2017

r? @alexcrichton

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned alexcrichton and unassigned eddyb Dec 22, 2017
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 22, 2017

📌 Commit 4156752 has been approved by alexcrichton

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Dec 22, 2017
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Dec 22, 2017

@bors rollup

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2017
Add support for CloudABI targets to the rustc backend.

CloudABI is a sandboxed UNIX-like runtime environment. It is a
programming environment that uses a capability-based security model. In
practice this means that many POSIX interfaces are present, except for
ones that try to access resources out of thin air. For example, open()
is gone, but openat() is present.

Right now I'm at the point where I can compile very basic CloudABI
applications on all four supported architectures (ARM and x86, 32 and 64
bits). The next step will be to get libstd to work. Patches for that are
outside the scope of this change.

More info: https://nuxi.nl/cloudabi/ /~https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc/
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2017
Add support for CloudABI targets to the rustc backend.

CloudABI is a sandboxed UNIX-like runtime environment. It is a
programming environment that uses a capability-based security model. In
practice this means that many POSIX interfaces are present, except for
ones that try to access resources out of thin air. For example, open()
is gone, but openat() is present.

Right now I'm at the point where I can compile very basic CloudABI
applications on all four supported architectures (ARM and x86, 32 and 64
bits). The next step will be to get libstd to work. Patches for that are
outside the scope of this change.

More info: https://nuxi.nl/cloudabi/ /~https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc/
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 25, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 4156752 with merge 5fbc16946fe8872de926930db12e20fbf1e28cbc...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 25, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Dec 25, 2017

@bors retry #47002

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 4156752 with merge b5b8dcffdff6bd640d877d3e497276152d8d296a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2017
Add support for CloudABI targets to the rustc backend.

CloudABI is a sandboxed UNIX-like runtime environment. It is a
programming environment that uses a capability-based security model. In
practice this means that many POSIX interfaces are present, except for
ones that try to access resources out of thin air. For example, open()
is gone, but openat() is present.

Right now I'm at the point where I can compile very basic CloudABI
applications on all four supported architectures (ARM and x86, 32 and 64
bits). The next step will be to get libstd to work. Patches for that are
outside the scope of this change.

More info: https://nuxi.nl/cloudabi/ /~https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc/
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2017
Rollup of 8 pull requests

- Successful merges: #46928, #46930, #46933, #46939, #46940, #46943, #46979, #46986
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 4156752 into rust-lang:master Dec 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants