Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove range-metadata amdgpu workaround #135027

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

Flakebi
Copy link
Contributor

@Flakebi Flakebi commented Jan 2, 2025

Range metadata was disabled for amdgpu due to a backend bug. I did not encounter any problems when removing the workaround to enable range metadata (tried compiling core and alloc), so I assume this has been fixed in LLVM in the last years.

Remove the workaround to re-enable range metadata.

Tracking issue: #135024

Range metadata was disabled for amdgpu due to a backend bug. I did not
encounter any problems when removing the workaround to enable range
metadata (tried compiling `core` and `alloc`), so I assume this has
been fixed in LLVM in the last years.

Remove the workaround to re-enable range metadata.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 2, 2025

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cjgillot (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 2, 2025
@Flakebi Flakebi mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
12 tasks
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

cc #52514

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 2, 2025

📌 Commit 56bf673 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 2, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135016 (Ping me for rustc-dev-guide subtree changes on this repo)
 - rust-lang#135027 (Remove range-metadata amdgpu workaround)
 - rust-lang#135029 (Update mailmap)
 - rust-lang#135033 (try to dedup me in the mailmap)
 - rust-lang#135035 (Fix formatting command)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e0cc6f1 into rust-lang:master Jan 2, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Jan 2, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135027 - Flakebi:remove-range-workaround, r=compiler-errors

Remove range-metadata amdgpu workaround

Range metadata was disabled for amdgpu due to a backend bug. I did not encounter any problems when removing the workaround to enable range metadata (tried compiling `core` and `alloc`), so I assume this has been fixed in LLVM in the last years.

Remove the workaround to re-enable range metadata.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#135024
@Flakebi Flakebi deleted the remove-range-workaround branch January 2, 2025 22:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants