Rollup of 4 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Explain base expression for struct update syntax #106893 (Explain base expression for struct update syntax)
• rustdoc: offset generic args of cross-crate trait object types when cleaning #119769 (rustdoc: offset generic args of cross-crate trait object types when cleaning)
• Fix an ICE that occurs after an error has already been reported #119772 (Fix an ICE that occurs after an error has already been reported)
• rint intrinsics: caution against actually trying to check for floating-point exceptions #119782 (rint intrinsics: caution against actually trying to check for floating-point exceptions)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

[bors]

📌 Commit 3fcddf1 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 3fcddf1 with merge e927184...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing e927184 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#106893	Explain base expression for struct update syntax	a27a6efc2b1b1bf93e485ec566b2d7385d502909 (link)
#119769	rustdoc: offset generic args of cross-crate trait object ty…	8c8492040006fbb66d6330ea4dafd3ef6be0a2de (link)
#119772	Fix an ICE that occurs after an error has already been repo…	61dd7f0c4e15a4ba678017905fa583ceadfde671 (link)
#119782	rint intrinsics: caution against actually trying to check f…	8e8c2edcf1fe18ccfc7e5953450a8f9e19742d28 (link)

previous master: 9273d63f07

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (e927184): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.1%	[-1.1%, -1.1%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-1.3%, -0.5%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.5%	[-2.9%, -2.2%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-1.3%, -0.5%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-0.6%, -0.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-0.6%, -0.6%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 668.513s -> 666.26s (-0.34%)
Artifact size: 308.41 MiB -> 308.39 MiB (-0.01%)