-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fall through when resolving elided assoc const lifetimes #115429
Conversation
r? @TaKO8Ki (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors r+ |
…rough, r=cjgillot Fall through when resolving elided assoc const lifetimes `@QuineDot` makes a good point in rust-lang#115010 (comment) that we probably should not accept *more* code due to rust-lang#115011 even though that code will eventually become a forbid-warning in a few versions (rust-lang#115010 (comment)). Fall through when walking thru the `AnonymousWarnToStatic` (renamed to `AnonymousWarn`) rib so that we can resolve as a fresh lifetime like we did before.
…rough, r=cjgillot Fall through when resolving elided assoc const lifetimes ``@QuineDot`` makes a good point in rust-lang#115010 (comment) that we probably should not accept *more* code due to rust-lang#115011 even though that code will eventually become a forbid-warning in a few versions (rust-lang#115010 (comment)). Fall through when walking thru the `AnonymousWarnToStatic` (renamed to `AnonymousWarn`) rib so that we can resolve as a fresh lifetime like we did before.
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (9229b1e): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 630.176s -> 629.877s (-0.05%) |
@QuineDot makes a good point in #115010 (comment) that we probably should not accept more code due to #115011 even though that code will eventually become a forbid-warning in a few versions (#115010 (comment)).
Fall through when walking thru the
AnonymousWarnToStatic
(renamed toAnonymousWarn
) rib so that we can resolve as a fresh lifetime like we did before.