-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(npm): support pnpm catalogs #33376
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(npm): support pnpm catalogs #33376
Conversation
Ah, I noticed now in my test repo that the lockfile does not get updated after a standalone catalog dependency upgrade. I missed that codepath when trying to keep the functionality minimal. I'll add it to my todo 🗒️ Update: this has since been fixed 🎉 |
@secustor and @viceice, apologies for the ping, do you have any pointers for the open questions here? If you think the PR is not in a reviewable state, I'm happy to implement with my gut feeling and re-request a review later down the line. I'm asking because I don't want to waste your time if something ends up being unworkable or unidiomatic, but I also don't want this to be stuck in limbo 😌 |
we usually don't review draft PRs, will try to have a look tomorrow |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had it on my plate, but haven't come around to finish it.
Open question 1: ways of picking up pnpm-workspace.yaml for extraction
pnpm-workspace.yaml
should be part of fileMatch.
The expectation is that users will have use cases which deviating filenames e.g. because they are overwriting this name in a config.
Ideally we detect the fact that it is a workspace file via schema or other marker and are not relying on it. That way we are not bound to the filename and it "magically" works.
Open question 2: depType and allowing granular updates to named catalogs
Having pnpm.catalog.foo
is preferable as with string pattern matching users can match all catalogs if needed.
Can you add an example of this in the readme.md
that way it will show up in the manager docs.
@secuster can't we discover the pnpm-workspace.yaml file automatically instead of needing it in fileMatch? |
If we are fine with only supporting this file name, we can drop it out of fileMatch. |
Ideally the name should be referenced from package.json. If not, I agree that we need to support it in fileMatch, but it's undesirable |
packageFile.path.endsWith('package.json') || | ||
packageFile.path.endsWith('pnpm-workspace.yaml') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hardcoding here tripped me up, I kept not seeing the lockfiles changing 😅 Does this not beat some of the point of allowing pnpm-workspace.yaml
(and package.json
) being renamed via fileMatch
? I wonder what the original context for the check was.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
K, I think this will lead to too much changes in this PR. :/
Let's support pnpm-workspace.yaml
and then support more names as needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it turned out to be a bit complicated indeed 😅 Would you rather I keep pnpm-workspace.yaml
in fileMatch
still? It probably does not hurt to keep it there, just to avoid any more changes, but I'm happy to remove it as well.
Thank you all kindly for your earler reviews! They helped clarify the direction quite a bit. I've made relevant changes now, tidied up the tests, implemented lockfile updating and locked version detection, and the coverage should be ok too. I'll put this up for a review now. Let me know if you spot anything that can be improved, and I'll get to it 🔧 |
lib/modules/manager/npm/__fixtures__/lockfile-parsing/pnpm-lock-v9.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sry, for the back and forth.
packageFile.path.endsWith('package.json') || | ||
packageFile.path.endsWith('pnpm-workspace.yaml') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
K, I think this will lead to too much changes in this PR. :/
Let's support pnpm-workspace.yaml
and then support more names as needed.
Now that we use the CST for substitutions, we can accept inputs that do not end in newlines. Even though that is not per the yaml spec, it does mean that we leave any source files formatting intact.
It turns out that including managerData in one of the extraction deps, would cause the top-level (packageFile) managerData to be overwritten for the corresponding upgrade. In practice, this meant that {managerData: {pnpmShrinkWrap: ''}} was not found, and no lockfile update was triggered.
Adding pnpm-workspace.yaml to the default matchFiles means that a few of the assertions were failing.
…ockfile This ensures that the lockfile update command will see the updated workspace file, and will update correctly. There was a hardcoded package.json check, that was previously precluding that.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Poxhofer <secustor@users.noreply.github.com>
This required a few more changes in the rest of the file, in order to mock fs and use the utils consistently.
This introduces a tryParsePnpmWorkspaceYaml function, which parses a string as YAML, and validates it via a schema, returning the result, and whether parsing succeeded. This allows the npm manager extraction call-site to only parse the content once, and pass on the parsed contents (if any) for extraction.
Previously, this was being tested _incidentally_, due to not mocking the filesystem calls.
33b479c
to
a0316a3
Compare
Changes
This PR adds support for pnpm catalogs, extracting dependencies from / updating dependencies in
pnpm-workspace.yaml
files.I took @rarkins' suggestion in #30079 (comment), and added this as part of the
npm
manager. I tried to keep the functionality contained inpnpm
files inside the relevant modules, to make it easier to split out in the future, if needed.I took care of the following things:
pnpm-workspace.yaml
files are picked up by default; their dependencies are extracted, and any updates are appliedpnpm-workspace.yaml
files can be renamed and specified infileMatch
. Thenpm
manager tries to parse a workspace YAML file first, before falling back to pakcage.json-like parsing.pnpmShrinkwrap
file gets picked up, to use for updating. I believe I implemented that correctly, but I might have missed something.These questions have been resolved; I leave the text here for posterity
Open question 1: ways of picking up
pnpm-workspace.yaml
for extractionI have placed
pnpm-workspace.yaml
in thefileMatch
defaultConfig of the npm manager, and added an extra branch toextractAllPackageFiles
.An alternative would be to do this work in
postExtract
, by looking up sibling/parentpnpm-workspace.yaml
file, and doing similar processing. This avoids the need for changing the config, but might have downsides that I cannot think of. What do you think?Open question 2:
depType
and allowing granular updates to named catalogsIn the current version, I gave catalog-related upgrades a
depType
ofpnpm.catalog
, just for namespacing. However, I am wondering whether we could go more granular with this, such aspnpm.catalog.<catalogName>
One of the pnpm examples for catalogs, is allowing incremental updates, by defining named catalogs:
In such a scenario, I imagine users wanting to keep react 17 and 18 each in their range (allowing for bugfixes), without bumping the major. To do that, we would need to expose the catalog name to the user for matching, such as
{matchDepTypes: ['pnpm.catalog.react17']}
.Have you had similar scenarios in the past? I noticed that
pnpm.overrides
kind of works like this, when using thepkg-a>pkg-b
syntax (reference, example), but based on the depName. This could probably be done in a follow-up PR, but it's good to think about 💭Context
Closes #30079
pnpm catalogs are described in the pnpm docs
This is my first Renovate contribution, I'm open to any and all ideas 😊
Documentation (please check one with an [x])
I made a small documentation addition for the readme.md of the npm manager, in order to mention
pnpm.catalogs.<name>
as adepType
.How I've tested my work (please select one)
I have verified these changes via:
I added unit tests for the extraction and updates, the latter being a similar set to the
package.json
update tests. I will double-check the code coverage on CI, I think I missed something when running coverage locally.I did a fair bit of repository testing at /~https://github.com/fpapado/renovate-testing-catalogs/pulls, to understand how the npm extraction/update phases work for
package.json
files.