This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 24, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 188
checker: allow to ignore some checking items #65
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
IANTHEREAL
added
priority/normal
Minor change, requires approval from ≥1 primary reviewer
status/PTAL
This PR is ready for review. Add this label back after committing new changes
type/enhancement
Performance improvement or refactoring
labels
Mar 5, 2019
/run-all-tests |
csuzhangxc
reviewed
Mar 6, 2019
} | ||
delete(checkingItems, AllChecking) | ||
|
||
c.Assert(FilterCheckingItems(ignoredCheckingItems[:0]), DeepEquals, checkingItems) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
c.Assert(FilterCheckingItems(ignoredCheckingItems[:0]), DeepEquals, checkingItems) | |
c.Assert(FilterCheckingItems(nil), DeepEquals, checkingItems) |
more readable?
@july2993 PTAL |
july2993
reviewed
Mar 6, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rest LGTM
return nil | ||
} | ||
|
||
checkingItems := config.FilterCheckingItems(cfgs[0].IgnoreCheckingItems) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unclear why just get from index 0
@july2993 @csuzhangxc PTAL again |
csuzhangxc
reviewed
Mar 7, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
july2993
approved these changes
Mar 7, 2019
csuzhangxc
added
status/LGT2
Two reviewers already commented LGTM, ready for merge
and removed
status/PTAL
This PR is ready for review. Add this label back after committing new changes
labels
Mar 7, 2019
lichunzhu
pushed a commit
to lichunzhu/dm
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2020
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
priority/normal
Minor change, requires approval from ≥1 primary reviewer
status/LGT2
Two reviewers already commented LGTM, ready for merge
type/enhancement
Performance improvement or refactoring
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
allow to ignore some checking items
What is changed and how it works?
add a
IgnoreCheckingItems
configuration, and use it to filter checking items inchecker
Check List
Tests
Code changes