Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OpenCensus metric bridge specification #2732

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

dashpole
Copy link
Contributor

@dashpole dashpole commented Aug 16, 2022

Part of #1175

Related to #2730

Depends on #2722. Do not merge until after that PR.

Changes

Specify that OpenCensus metric bridges implement the MetricProducer interface, and describe non-trivial transformations involved.

This follows the path taken by the java opencensus-shim.

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Aug 24, 2022
@jsuereth jsuereth removed the Stale label Aug 29, 2022
> conventions, All API surface area should map to the closest relevant OTel
> API and no SDK usage of OpenCensus will be compatible.
OpenTelemetry will provide an OpenCensus-Metrics-Shim component which
implements the OpenTelemetry MetricProducer interface. When Produce() is
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#nit: Add link to MetricProducer interface when available.

specification/compatibility/opencensus.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/compatibility/opencensus.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 22, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

Closed as inactive. Feel free to reopen if this PR is still being worked on.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Sep 30, 2022
@dashpole
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll reopen after we decide on #2838

@dashpole
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR can be reopened now that #2951 is merged

@reyang
Copy link
Member

reyang commented Nov 22, 2022

Looks like we need a new one:

image

@dashpole
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, darn. Reopened as #2979

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants