Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

curate format-dates: Mention that 'XX' can be used in --expected-date-formats #1718

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

victorlin
Copy link
Member

@victorlin victorlin commented Jan 13, 2025

Description of proposed changes

This is worth calling out because it would be reasonable for a user to assume that Augur's support XX is automatically applied to dates like %Y-%m-%d. The added explicit mention + existing list of builtin formats including XX explicitly should help avoid that assumption.

Related issue(s)

#1709 (comment)

Checklist

@victorlin victorlin force-pushed the victorlin/ExtendOverwriteDefault-everwhere branch from 49568ad to 28e6e8c Compare January 14, 2025 18:33
Base automatically changed from victorlin/ExtendOverwriteDefault-everwhere to master January 14, 2025 18:48
victorlin and others added 2 commits January 14, 2025 10:59
This is worth calling out because it would be reasonable for a user to
assume that Augur's support XX is automatically applied to dates like
%Y-%m-%d. The added explicit mention + existing list of builtin formats
including XX explicitly should help avoid that assumption.

Co-authored-by: Thomas Sibley <tsibley@fredhutch.org>
@victorlin victorlin force-pushed the victorlin/update-expected-date-formats-help branch from 9c8635b to 62299d3 Compare January 14, 2025 18:59
@victorlin victorlin merged commit 1688855 into master Jan 14, 2025
36 checks passed
@victorlin victorlin deleted the victorlin/update-expected-date-formats-help branch January 14, 2025 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants