Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[next] chore(deps): update vite deps #6380

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Conversation

raimund-schluessler
Copy link
Contributor

☑️ Resolves

  • Update vite depenencies of the next branch

@raimund-schluessler raimund-schluessler added 3. to review Waiting for reviews dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Jan 14, 2025
@raimund-schluessler raimund-schluessler added this to the 9.0.0-alpha.6 milestone Jan 14, 2025
@raimund-schluessler raimund-schluessler marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2025 07:28
@raimund-schluessler raimund-schluessler changed the title chore(deps): update vite deps [next] chore(deps): update vite deps Jan 14, 2025
@raimund-schluessler raimund-schluessler force-pushed the chore/noid/vite-deps branch 2 times, most recently from caec298 to 95990d9 Compare January 22, 2025 20:41
Signed-off-by: Raimund Schlüßler <raimund.schluessler@mailbox.org>
@raimund-schluessler raimund-schluessler marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 20:43
Signed-off-by: Ferdinand Thiessen <opensource@fthiessen.de>
@susnux
Copy link
Contributor

susnux commented Jan 22, 2025

same as with webpack on master we needed to adjust the import paths for sass.

@raimund-schluessler raimund-schluessler merged commit 837cabf into next Jan 23, 2025
20 checks passed
@raimund-schluessler raimund-schluessler deleted the chore/noid/vite-deps branch January 23, 2025 05:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants