Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Clang][Sema] Do not mark template parameters in the exception specification as used during partial ordering #91534

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -713,6 +713,9 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
- Correctly treat the compound statement of an ``if consteval`` as an immediate context. Fixes (#GH91509).
- When partial ordering alias templates against template template parameters,
allow pack expansions when the alias has a fixed-size parameter list. Fixes (#GH62529).
- Clang now ignores template parameters only used within the exception specification of candidate function
templates during partial ordering when deducing template arguments from a function declaration or when
taking the address of a function template.

Bug Fixes to AST Handling
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Expand Down
36 changes: 28 additions & 8 deletions clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5453,7 +5453,7 @@ static bool isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc,
// is used.
if (DeduceTemplateArgumentsByTypeMatch(
S, TemplateParams, FD2->getType(), FD1->getType(), Info, Deduced,
TDF_None,
TDF_AllowCompatibleFunctionType,
/*PartialOrdering=*/true) != TemplateDeductionResult::Success)
return false;
break;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -5485,20 +5485,40 @@ static bool isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc,
switch (TPOC) {
case TPOC_Call:
for (unsigned I = 0, N = Args2.size(); I != N; ++I)
::MarkUsedTemplateParameters(S.Context, Args2[I], false,
TemplateParams->getDepth(),
UsedParameters);
::MarkUsedTemplateParameters(S.Context, Args2[I], /*OnlyDeduced=*/false,
TemplateParams->getDepth(), UsedParameters);
break;

case TPOC_Conversion:
::MarkUsedTemplateParameters(S.Context, Proto2->getReturnType(), false,
::MarkUsedTemplateParameters(S.Context, Proto2->getReturnType(),
/*OnlyDeduced=*/false,
TemplateParams->getDepth(), UsedParameters);
break;

case TPOC_Other:
::MarkUsedTemplateParameters(S.Context, FD2->getType(), false,
TemplateParams->getDepth(),
UsedParameters);
// We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification
// when determining the primary template of a function template
// specialization or when taking the address of a function template.
// Therefore, we do not mark template parameters in the exception
// specification as used during partial ordering to prevent the following
// from being ambiguous:
//
// template<typename T, typename U>
// void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1
//
// template<typename T>
// void f(T*) noexcept; // #2
//
// template<>
// void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // explicit specialization of #2
//
// Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard, this seems
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please file a core issue here! It would be great to get this fixed in CWG. @Endilll or @shafik can help with that if you need it. Also, put the CWG issue # in this comment once we have it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll open it tomorrow

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@erichkeane Filed an issue here. It might be a little while before an actual core issue is opened, so would it be alright to merge this before that happens?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Jens is usually really quick at assigning a core issue, right? That said, you can merge this before getting one as long as you come back afterwards and fill it in.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've seen it take anywhere from a day to a month. I'll be sure to update this once the issue is opened!

// to be the intended behavior given the definition of
// 'deduction substitution loci' in [temp.deduct].
::MarkUsedTemplateParameters(
S.Context,
S.Context.getFunctionTypeWithExceptionSpec(FD2->getType(), EST_None),
/*OnlyDeduced=*/false, TemplateParams->getDepth(), UsedParameters);
break;
}

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// expected-no-diagnostics

template<bool B>
struct A { };

constexpr A<false> a;
constexpr A<false> b;

constexpr int* x = nullptr;
constexpr short* y = nullptr;

namespace ExplicitArgs {
template<typename T, typename U>
constexpr int f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())) {
return 0;
}

template<typename T>
constexpr int f(T*) noexcept {
return 1;
}

template<>
constexpr int f<int>(int*) noexcept {
return 2;
}

static_assert(f<int>(1) == 0);
static_assert(f<short>(y) == 1);
static_assert(f<int>(x) == 2);

template<typename T, typename U>
constexpr int g(U*) noexcept(noexcept(T())) {
return 3;
}

template<typename T>
constexpr int g(T) noexcept {
return 4;
}

template<>
constexpr int g<int>(int*) noexcept {
return 5;
}

static_assert(g<int>(y) == 3);
static_assert(g<short>(1) == 4);
static_assert(g<int>(x) == 5);
} // namespace ExplicitArgs

namespace DeducedArgs {
template<typename T, bool B>
constexpr int f(T, A<B>) noexcept(B) {
return 0;
}

template<typename T, bool B>
constexpr int f(T*, A<B>) noexcept(B && B) {
return 1;
}

template<>
constexpr int f(int*, A<false>) {
return 2;
}

static_assert(f<int*>(x, a) == 0);
static_assert(f<short>(y, a) == 1);
static_assert(f<int>(x, a) == 2);
} // namespace DeducedArgs
Loading