-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
create network: use locks and reservations to solve race condition #10858
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how about using our Existing lock package ?
/~https://github.com/medyagh/minikube/blob/f95d43a2c78070ab10a4e7d134ff2d0952a5ca86/pkg/util/lock/lock.g o#L48
for better maintainability of the lock code, what is the Special about Locking a network Name that is different than other Locks in minikube?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
here we need to lock a specific currently free network segment (not a network name) for a caller for a short period of time:
when a call to network.FreeSubnet() is made, it checks if a subnet is taken at the system level and skip those;
furthermore, in case of concurrent calls to network.FreeSubnet(), it also needs to skip all those network segments that were previously returned as 'free' (to other callers), but those other callers, within a configurable grace period, have not yet allocated the subnet at the system level
the existing locking mechanism with lock.PathMutexSpec() takes care of concurrent requests that would want to write to the same file by making them wait for their turn
on the other hand, with the free subnet allocation, we need a mechanism that would instantly know & skip if a subnet is either already taken or 'reserved' but not yet expired, and so to move on to the next free subnet
therefore i used sync.Map that has a built-in mechanism for safe concurrent access for 'reservations' with key:subnet and value:createdAt to be able to check if the subnet reservation expired (so free to reuse)
does that make sense?