-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
dev: add docker healthcheck in compose #338
dev: add docker healthcheck in compose #338
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, though I'd like to make sure that madara has no healthcheck route available first.
We should also add a healthcheck to katana, even though it's fast enough we actually want to make sure that we don't start the other containers until the "starknet" network is ready
e1e1109
to
4232be2
Compare
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #338 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 23.17% 73.25% +50.07%
===========================================
Files 9 30 +21
Lines 1247 2202 +955
===========================================
+ Hits 289 1613 +1324
+ Misses 958 589 -369
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since health check got merged in dojo, what now?:)
Let me pin the image tag for dojo 👍 |
Alright great |
The merge-base changed after approval.
The merge-base changed after approval.
The merge-base changed after approval.
The merge-base changed after approval.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
b4ae6d3
to
85234cd
Compare
Time spent on this PR: 0.01
Resolves: #337, #371
Pull Request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
What is the new behavior?
Create a side-car container that does a healthcheck on the
starknet
service that it is ready to accept connections before deploying Kakarot contractsDoes this introduce a breaking change?