Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add 'ipfs multibase' commands #8180
feat: add 'ipfs multibase' commands #8180
Changes from 5 commits
c41b68a
82baaa3
8d09010
36e60d2
0ccf9b2
cb997aa
509b2a0
27bf745
1c8c234
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Going to merge for now as this seems like it wouldn't hurt and matches what
ipfs cid
does.However, I don't think this really works properly without applying the flag to each subcommand.
@lidel let's revisit during the RC process what we want to do here and figure out if
ipfs cid
has similar problems.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Continued in #8375 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be worth implementing a multibase Decoder that would take an
io.Reader
and return one as well, with a signature likeNewDecoder(io.Reader) io.Reader
Then this could all be done without having to read the entire file into memory.
@lidel Seems like this is something that should exist, or am I missing an obvious reason it does not? Seems like a
NewDecode
function could start reading the stream, and then construct the correct decoder and return it as anio.Reader
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question! I filled upstream issue multiformats/go-multibase#44 to discuss this, but out of scope for this PR.