Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Complete internal rewrite - new result API #1562

Draft
wants to merge 54 commits into
base: staging
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jsnel
Copy link
Member

@jsnel jsnel commented Dec 10, 2024

TODO: summarize the close to 200 commits.

Joined effort from maintainers:

Change summary

  • TODO1 - WIP
  • TODO1 - WIP

Checklist

  • ✔️ Passing the tests (mandatory for all PR's)
  • 🚧 Added changes to changelog (mandatory for all PR's)
  • 👌 Closes issue (mandatory for ✨ feature and 🩹 bug fix PR's)
  • 🧪 Adds new tests for the feature (mandatory for ✨ feature and 🩹 bug fix PR's)
  • 📚 Adds documentation of the feature

Closes issues

closes #XXXX

joernweissenborn and others added 30 commits July 6, 2024 17:08
Which is more consistent with 0.7 API
Forward port of

🩹 Fix prepare_dataset's add_svd_to_dataset function (glotaran#1522)
This fix relies on assert to narrow down types.
However using more uniform interfaces would be a more desirable way to solve this, but this is out of scope for a review fix.
_associated_amplitude_ -> _associated_amplitudes_
_associated_concentration_ -> _associated_concentrations_
to be more consistent with model/scheme definition
Make calculate_parameter_errors a seperate function
- removes extras
- add activations
- unpack (what was in) data to top level including:
-- input_data
-- residual(s)
- make fitted_data a property (computed on the fly)
- make keyword arguments only
DatasetResult -> OptimizationResult
(possible because of precious optimization_info refactor)

Give DOAS and kinetic test more meaningful names
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
E Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@jsnel jsnel changed the base branch from main to staging February 16, 2025 18:42
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants