-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(upgrade): v1.9.0 to v1.10.0 #2104
chore(upgrade): v1.9.0 to v1.10.0 #2104
Conversation
474c0f9
to
9b6fa5c
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ |
2a7dccd
to
0e84494
Compare
0e84494
to
f95ebf1
Compare
80a8804
to
672b981
Compare
dbceeab
to
e19190b
Compare
- Upgrade Polkadot-sdk 1.9.0 to 1.10.0 - Update weights to reflect the new version. Notable Changes: - [Remove experimental flag](/~https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3654/files) - [Remove pallet::getter macro](paritytech/polkadot-sdk#3350) - [Refactor APIs](/~https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3817/files#diff-b02373af4015a8ebdf3a3f5be9ea0ce555b6e45331872e0465fd2f488177d383) - [Refactor Unified Host Functions](paritytech/polkadot-sdk#3854) - [StorageWeightReclaim SignedExtension](/~https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3002/files) For more details, please refer to: [Release Notes](/~https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/releases/tag/polkadot-v1.10.0)
21a1260
to
06462ac
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did not notice any major changes aside from big refactor which look 👍🏽
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Read the code and looked good. There are some questions about weight changes. In general they are decreased but they are increased for base block and base extrinsic.
// Minimum execution time: 39_381_000 picoseconds. | ||
Weight::from_parts(40_678_000, 6249) | ||
// Minimum execution time: 35_236_000 picoseconds. | ||
Weight::from_parts(36_395_000, 6249) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Do we know why this is reduced?
pub const BlockExecutionWeight: Weight = | ||
Weight::from_parts(WEIGHT_REF_TIME_PER_NANOS.saturating_mul(245_079), 0); | ||
Weight::from_parts(WEIGHT_REF_TIME_PER_NANOS.saturating_mul(355_340), 0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I wonder why is this increased 100k
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question. We added a new Signed Extension.
62b42de
to
3aa9a19
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really any logic changes or anything. As long as it works, LGTM!
Notable Changes:
For more details, please refer to:
Release Notes
#1928