Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new(falco): add base_syscalls.all option to replace -A #3352

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

LucaGuerra
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area engine

What this PR does / why we need it:

This adds base_syscalls.all replacing -A.

This PR has not yet been linted. If the lint PR is merged I will update.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

new(falco): add base_syscalls.all option to falco.yaml, deprecate -A

@FedeDP
Copy link
Contributor

FedeDP commented Sep 30, 2024

I like the idea; let's deprecated yet another CLI option!
/milestone 0.40.0

@poiana poiana added this to the 0.40.0 milestone Sep 30, 2024
@LucaGuerra LucaGuerra force-pushed the new/base_syscalls_all_option branch 2 times, most recently from 2abd2db to e4e41f8 Compare September 30, 2024 15:24
@LucaGuerra LucaGuerra changed the title new(falco): add base_syscalls.all option to replace -A wip: new(falco): add base_syscalls.all option to replace -A Sep 30, 2024
@LucaGuerra
Copy link
Contributor Author

need to fix formatting / tests

@LucaGuerra LucaGuerra force-pushed the new/base_syscalls_all_option branch from e4e41f8 to f71fc81 Compare October 1, 2024 08:41
@LucaGuerra LucaGuerra changed the title wip: new(falco): add base_syscalls.all option to replace -A new(falco): add base_syscalls.all option to replace -A Oct 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; same comment as #3362 (comment) applies here too; wdyt?

@LucaGuerra LucaGuerra force-pushed the new/base_syscalls_all_option branch 2 times, most recently from c7512e5 to 0198250 Compare October 2, 2024 10:19
@LucaGuerra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@FedeDP done!

FedeDP
FedeDP previously approved these changes Oct 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Oct 7, 2024

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 82258bc679f56a392dfd9220b72876d49d50a99e

Signed-off-by: Luca Guerra <luca@guerra.sh>
Signed-off-by: Luca Guerra <luca@guerra.sh>
@poiana poiana removed the lgtm label Oct 10, 2024
@poiana poiana requested a review from FedeDP October 10, 2024 07:45
@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Oct 10, 2024

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: e8d5943a7b584ccb53381844e70f19223cf91c6a

Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Oct 10, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: FedeDP, LucaGuerra

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana poiana merged commit dfa6b9b into falcosecurity:master Oct 10, 2024
34 checks passed
@LucaGuerra LucaGuerra deleted the new/base_syscalls_all_option branch October 10, 2024 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants