Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

podman run use pod userns even with --pod-id-file #23082

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Jun 24, 2024

The pod was set after we checked the namespace and the namespace code only checked the --pod flag but didn't consider --pod-id-file option. As such fix the check to first set the pod option on the spec then use that for the namespace. Also make sure we always use an empty default otherwise it would be impossible in the backend to know if a user requested a specific userns or not, i.e. even in case of a set PODMAN_USERNS env a container should still get the userns from the pod and not use the var in this case. Therefore unset it from the default cli value.

There are more issues here around --pod-id-file and cli validation that does not consider the option as conflicting with --userns like --pod does but I decided to fix the bug at hand and don't try to fix the entire mess which most likely would take days.

Fixes #22931

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Fixed a bug where using podman run/create --pod-id-file did not respect the pod's userns.  

The pod was set after we checked the namespace and the namespace code
only checked the --pod flag but didn't consider --pod-id-file option.
As such fix the check to first set the pod option on the spec then use
that for the namespace. Also make sure we always use an empty default
otherwise it would be impossible in the backend to know if a user
requested a specific userns or not, i.e. even in case of a set
PODMAN_USERNS env a container should still get the userns from the pod
and not use the var in this case. Therefore unset it from the default
cli value.

There are more issues here around --pod-id-file and cli validation that
does not consider the option as conflicting with --userns like --pod
does but I decided to fix the bug at hand and don't try to fix the
entire mess which most likely would take days.

Fixes containers#22931

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 24, 2024
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 24, 2024

LGTM
@giuseppe PTAL

Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d4c4801 into containers:main Jun 25, 2024
89 of 90 checks passed
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the pod-id-file branch June 25, 2024 09:44
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Quadlet containers in Quadlet pods ignore user namespace
3 participants