Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix volume reporting in system df #14755

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

cdoern
Copy link
Contributor

@cdoern cdoern commented Jun 28, 2022

currently, podman system df incorrectly calculates the reclaimable storage for
volumes, using a cumulative reclaimable variable that is incremented and placed into each
report entry causing values to rise above 100%.

Switch this variable to be in the context of the loop, so it resets per volume just like the size variable does.

resolves #13516

Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern cdoern@redhat.com

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 28, 2022

Nice catch
LGTM
/approve
@vrothberg @giuseppe @mheon @baude PTAL
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 28, 2022
currently, podman system df incorrectly calculates the reclaimable storage for
volumes, using a cumulative reclaimable variable that is incremented and placed into each
report entry causing values to rise above 100%.

Switch this variables to be in the context of the loop, so it resets per volume just like the size variable does.

resolves containers#13516

Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jun 28, 2022

/lgtm
/approve
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 28, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 28, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cdoern, mheon, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cdoern cdoern removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 28, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit f0e8904 into containers:main Jun 28, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Storage utilisation doesn't seem to add-up...
4 participants