Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature/refactor: Loop system and Worklist execution model #731

Closed
wants to merge 116 commits into from

Conversation

ltdrdata
Copy link
Collaborator

@ltdrdata ltdrdata commented Jun 3, 2023

major changes:

  • Preventing stack overflow in deep recursion in Python.
    • Handling worklists of arbitrary length
  • Eliminating inefficiency due to call stack cost
  • Improved control over the processing order of nodes
  • Add functionality of interrupting a specific execution path in a node using the return None value.
  • Allows '*' input/output for nodes
  • Support loop structure
  • Allow the outputs of muted nodes to be preserved instead of discarding them, enabling them to be utilized later in the workflow.
  • Allows empty list for output

minor improvement:

  • bugfix about crash related to specific mute condition

ltdrdata and others added 23 commits June 3, 2023 13:27
* Preventing stack overflow in deep recursion in Python.
  * Handling worklists of arbitrary length
  * Allowing future extension for loop structures
* Eliminating inefficiency due to call stack cost
* Improved control over the processing order of nodes
…de using the return None value.

* allows '*' input/output for nodes
@ltdrdata ltdrdata changed the title refactor: change recursion style execution to worklist style execution feature/refator: Loop system and Worklist execution model Jun 16, 2023
@ltdrdata ltdrdata changed the title feature/refator: Loop system and Worklist execution model feature/refactor: Loop system and Worklist execution model Jun 16, 2023
@ltdrdata
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm closing this since it's better to replace it with this PR.
#931

@ltdrdata ltdrdata closed this Aug 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant