-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve v4 Signer.SignHTTP & Signer.PresignHTTP performance #2956
Closed
boekkooi-impossiblecloud
wants to merge
6
commits into
aws:main
from
boekkooi-impossiblecloud:v4-signing-performance-tweaks
+61
−30
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
62c0969
use sha256.Sum256 to reduce allocations
boekkooi-impossiblecloud ccdf28e
avoid []string allocation
boekkooi-impossiblecloud ac435cb
avoid unicode.AppendRune by using WriteByte
boekkooi-impossiblecloud a2ad4d6
allocate http.Header
boekkooi-impossiblecloud 0b7c63e
add changelog entry
boekkooi-impossiblecloud 1225ee7
Update .changelog/7bacfa97-ac95-4390-8c46-9d0528bda2c1.json
lucix-aws File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"id": "7bacfa97-ac95-4390-8c46-9d0528bda2c1", | ||
"type": "feature", | ||
"description": "Improve v4 Signer.SignHTTP & Signer.PresignHTTP performance", | ||
"collapse": false, | ||
"modules": [ | ||
"." | ||
] | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In fact, is this actually an improvement? strings.Join uses strings.Builder internally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a minor improvement of around -0.45% in the Benchmark.
I agree that it's a little less readable but I also expect this code to not change any time soon and in our solution we sign a lot for requests and every little improvement helps.
However, I'm fine removing the related commit from the PR if it's a deal breaker.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI not using
strings.Join
has some precedence in lookupKey and buildAuthorizationHeaderThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's older code and it's something we very much want to get away from. I made a point to do away with all of it in the rewrite in the aws-http-auth module.