This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
Tidy up storage allocation and deallocation #14480
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@mxnet-label-bot add [pr-work-in-progress] |
yuxihu
changed the title
Fix memory leak for size-zero ndarray
Tidy up storage allocation and deallocation
Mar 20, 2019
yuxihu
force-pushed
the
fix_mem_leak
branch
3 times, most recently
from
March 21, 2019 19:15
cfbb447
to
d9396da
Compare
@eric-haibin-lin @apeforest @anirudh2290 Please help review. |
@mxnet-label-bot update [pr-awaiting-review] |
marcoabreu
added
pr-awaiting-review
PR is waiting for code review
and removed
pr-work-in-progress
PR is still work in progress
labels
Mar 25, 2019
larroy
reviewed
Mar 26, 2019
apeforest
reviewed
Mar 26, 2019
apeforest
reviewed
Mar 26, 2019
apeforest
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. just two small nit comments for styling.
anirudh2290
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2019
anirudh2290
reviewed
Mar 27, 2019
@mxnet-label-bot update [pr-awaiting-merge] |
marcoabreu
added
pr-awaiting-merge
Review and CI is complete. Ready to Merge
and removed
pr-awaiting-review
PR is waiting for code review
labels
Mar 28, 2019
vdantu
pushed a commit
to vdantu/incubator-mxnet
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2019
* free memory when dptr is not nullptr * skip memory allocation when handle size is 0 * update comments * update Alloc in naive storage manager * address comments * add unit test for size 0 allocation
ZhennanQin
pushed a commit
to ZhennanQin/incubator-mxnet
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2019
* free memory when dptr is not nullptr * skip memory allocation when handle size is 0 * update comments * update Alloc in naive storage manager * address comments * add unit test for size 0 allocation
nswamy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2019
* free memory when dptr is not nullptr * skip memory allocation when handle size is 0 * update comments * update Alloc in naive storage manager * address comments * add unit test for size 0 allocation
yuxihu
added a commit
to yuxihu/incubator-mxnet
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2019
* free memory when dptr is not nullptr * skip memory allocation when handle size is 0 * update comments * update Alloc in naive storage manager * address comments * add unit test for size 0 allocation
szha
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2019
haohuanw
pushed a commit
to haohuanw/incubator-mxnet
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2019
* free memory when dptr is not nullptr * skip memory allocation when handle size is 0 * update comments * update Alloc in naive storage manager * address comments * add unit test for size 0 allocation
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently we have inconsistent allocation and deallocation behaviors among storage managers. There are two major observations:
These inconsistencies make it error-prone to write code. In this PR, we tidy up the storage allocation and deallocation behaviors by doing:
This PR fixes #13951, fixes #14358