Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] Update docs for upcoming version 0.10 #53

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Tveten
Copy link
Collaborator

@Tveten Tveten commented Dec 12, 2024

@Tveten Tveten self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.50%. Comparing base (744de5b) to head (7405dbc).
Report is 26 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #53   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.50%   97.50%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        1680     1680           
=======================================
  Hits         1638     1638           
  Misses         42       42           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Tveten Tveten added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 12, 2024
@Tveten Tveten changed the title Update docs for upcoming version 0.10 [DOC] Update docs for upcoming version 0.10 Dec 12, 2024
@Tveten Tveten merged commit cac96df into main Dec 12, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@Tveten Tveten deleted the fix-docs-backticks branch December 12, 2024 23:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[DOC] in docstrings, should we replace single backtick by double backtick?
1 participant