We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
完善第一版论证结构:
总结一下:最后我(覃睿)跟王同学回到“精进”跟“探索”的定义和界线的讨论觉得还挺有意义的。我跟王同学的想法是我们后续的讨论需要先回到定义上来,把概念定义清楚之后论证会顺很多。 今天的作业我会增加一个“成本”维度的论点交上去先,之后应该会有教练入驻。
puzzling:破题之后 可否多快好省论证?—— 精进大概率优(可放C1),效率高(一通百通,放C2),成就大(放C3,理解的深度),成本省 美滋滋 ———— 小伙伴们,可行吗?
覃:有点意思,我觉得可以往下深入
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
完善第一版论证结构:
总结一下:最后我(覃睿)跟王同学回到“精进”跟“探索”的定义和界线的讨论觉得还挺有意义的。我跟王同学的想法是我们后续的讨论需要先回到定义上来,把概念定义清楚之后论证会顺很多。
今天的作业我会增加一个“成本”维度的论点交上去先,之后应该会有教练入驻。
puzzling:破题之后
可否多快好省论证?——
精进大概率优(可放C1),效率高(一通百通,放C2),成就大(放C3,理解的深度),成本省
美滋滋
————
小伙伴们,可行吗?
覃:有点意思,我觉得可以往下深入
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: