Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Example Pull Request with insufficient grading results #31

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

uhafner
Copy link
Owner

@uhafner uhafner commented Dec 6, 2023

A pull request with a solution that has some warnings. Additionally, the coverage is not at 100%.

Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 7, 2023
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 7, 2023
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 7, 2023
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 7, 2023
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 7, 2023
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 7, 2023
@uhafner uhafner added tests Enhancement of tests internal Internal changes without user or API impact and removed tests Enhancement of tests labels Dec 7, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 7, 2023

🎓 Quality Checks - 479 of 500

🚦 Tests - 100 of 100

21 tests passed

🐾 Code Coverage - 93 of 100

93% Covered , 7% Missed

🦠 Mutation Coverage - 87 of 100

87% Killed , 13% Survived

⚠️ Style - 99 of 100

1 warning found (0 errors, 0 high, 1 normal, 0 low)

🐛 Bugs - 100 of 100

no warnings found

More details are available in the GitHub Checks Result.

Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 7, 2023
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 7, 2023
@uhafner uhafner marked this pull request as draft December 7, 2023 13:23
@uhafner uhafner changed the title Bad solution Example Pull Request with insufficient grading results Dec 7, 2023
Copy link

🎓 Quality Checks - 479 of 500

🚦 Tests - 100 of 100

21 tests passed

👣 Code Coverage - 93 of 100

93% Covered , 7% Missed

🔬 Mutation Coverage - 87 of 100

87% Killed , 13% Survived

⚠️ Style - 99 of 100

1 warning found (0 errors, 0 high, 1 normal, 0 low)

🐛 Bugs - 100 of 100

No warnings found

More details are available in the GitHub Checks Result.

Copy link

🎓   Quality Checks - 300 of 500 (60%)

Score percentage: 60%

   🚦   Tests - 100 of 100: 100 % successful (✔️ 21 passed)
   〰️   Line Coverage - 0 of 100: 0% (0 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage - 0 of 100: 0% (0 missed branches)
   PIT   Mutation Coverage - 0 of 100: 0% (0 survived mutations)
   CheckStyle   CheckStyle - 100 of 100: No warnings
   PMD   PMD - 100 of 100: No warnings
   ⚠️   Error Prone - 100 of 100: No warnings
   SpotBugs   SpotBugs - 100 of 100: No warnings

🚧 Error Messages

Autograding Errors:
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml'! Configuration error for 'Line Coverage'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml'! Configuration error for 'Branch Coverage'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/pit-reports/mutations.xml'! Configuration error for 'Mutation Coverage'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/checkstyle-result.xml'! Configuration error for 'CheckStyle'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'PMD'?

Created by Autograding v3.19.0 (#ed535be). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

@uhafner uhafner closed this Feb 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
internal Internal changes without user or API impact
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant