Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Auto merge of #80205 - tomprogrammer:prettyprint-pattern-mut-binding,…
… r=davidtwco Fix pretty printing an AST representing `&(mut ident)` The PR fixes a misguiding help diagnostic in the parser that I reported in #80186. I discovered that the parsers recovery and reporting logic was correct but the pretty printer produced wrong code for the example. (Details in #80186 (comment)) Example: ```rust #![allow(unused_variables)] fn main() { let mut &x = &0; } ``` The AST fragment `PatKind::Ref(PatKind::Ident(BindingMode::ByValue(Mutability::Mut), ..), Mutability::Not)` was printed to be `&mut ident`. But this wouldn't round trip through parsing again, because then it would be: `PatKind::Ref(PatKind::Ident(BindingMode::ByValue(Mutability::Not), ..), Mutability::Mut)` Now the pretty-printer prints `&(mut ident)`. Reparsing that code results in the AST fragment `PatKind::Ref(PatKind::Paren(PatKind::Ident(BindingMode::ByValue(Mutability::Mut), ..)), Mutability::Not)` which I think should behave like the original pattern. Old diagnostic: ``` error: `mut` must be attached to each individual binding --> src/main.rs:3:9 | 3 | let mut &x = &0; | ^^^^^^ help: add `mut` to each binding: `&mut x` | = note: `mut` may be followed by `variable` and `variable @ pattern` ``` New diagnostic: ``` error: `mut` must be attached to each individual binding --> src/main.rs:3:9 | 3 | let mut &x = &0; | ^^^^^^ help: add `mut` to each binding: `&(mut x)` | = note: `mut` may be followed by `variable` and `variable @ pattern` ``` Fixes #80186
- Loading branch information