Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for etcd snapshot and restore #45

Closed
davidnuzik opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for etcd snapshot and restore #45

davidnuzik opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/rancher-integration Needed to support Rancher integration kind/task Work not related to bug fixes or new functionality

Comments

@davidnuzik
Copy link
Contributor

davidnuzik commented Jun 24, 2020

Add support for RKE2 snapshot, backup, and restore via Rancher via CLI.

  • must also take automatic snapshots periodically.
  • On by default
  • Controlled via config args
  • Supports S3 (need this capability similar to RKE1) Not need for 1.0
  • Restore functionality folded into rke2 --cluster-reset - You restore by triggering a cluster-reset with a restore path arg specifified
@davidnuzik davidnuzik added kind/task Work not related to bug fixes or new functionality [zube]: Backlog kind/rancher-integration Needed to support Rancher integration labels Jun 24, 2020
@davidnuzik davidnuzik added this to the Post-MVP milestone Jun 24, 2020
@cjellick cjellick modified the milestones: Post-GA, GA Jul 31, 2020
@davidnuzik davidnuzik changed the title Rancher Integration: Support for etcd snapshot, backup, restore Rancher CLI: Support for etcd snapshot, backup, restore Aug 5, 2020
@cjellick cjellick changed the title Rancher CLI: Support for etcd snapshot, backup, restore Support for etcd snapshot and restore Aug 27, 2020
@rancher-max rancher-max self-assigned this Aug 31, 2020
@rancher-max
Copy link
Member

Using rke2 beta16 to validate:

@rancher-max
Copy link
Member

@rancher-max
Copy link
Member

I think the support for etcd snapshot and restore is functional. There are a few issues that came from testing this that should be addressed on their own at this point.
Namely #320 and #353

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/rancher-integration Needed to support Rancher integration kind/task Work not related to bug fixes or new functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants