Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding large SDKs to the library-and-framework-list.json #151

Open
msailes opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Adding large SDKs to the library-and-framework-list.json #151

msailes opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@msailes
Copy link
Contributor

msailes commented Dec 16, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Adding the AWS SDK for Java 2.0 to the library-and-framework-list.json is difficult because it is made up of 418 separate artifacts. Adding each one individually would be annoying and bloat the file for other users.

Describe the solution you'd like
Allow the artifact field to include a * "artifact": "software.amazon.awssdk:*"

Describe alternatives you've considered
Writing out 418 separate enteries

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

This was my first draft at the addition

  {
    "artifact": "software.amazon.awssdk:*",
    "description": "AWS SDK for Java 2.0",
    "details": [
      {
        "minimum_version": "2.16.1",
        "metadata_locations": [
          "https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/software/amazon/awssdk/"
        ],
        "tests_locations": [
          "/~https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java-v2/tree/master/test/sdk-native-image-test"
        ],
        "test_level": "community-tested"
      }
    ]
  }
@msailes msailes added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 16, 2022
@fniephaus fniephaus self-assigned this Dec 16, 2022
@fniephaus
Copy link
Member

Hi Mark,
Let's follow up on this. So far, the JSON is used to generate the table on this website, so I don't see a reason why we can't allow wildcards for the artifact ID. If you could open a PR with the entry you'd like to add, we can adjust the schema accordingly. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
3 participants