Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ci release builds #1988

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

fix: ci release builds #1988

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

Arqu
Copy link
Collaborator

@Arqu Arqu commented Jan 31, 2024

Description

After the initial merge of #1987 made some fixes.

Notes & open questions

Change checklist

  • Self-review.
  • Documentation updates if relevant.
  • Tests if relevant.

@Arqu Arqu requested a review from b5 January 31, 2024 21:19
@Arqu Arqu self-assigned this Jan 31, 2024
@Arqu Arqu requested a review from flub February 1, 2024 07:34
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ jobs:
env:
# Using self-hosted runners so use local cache for sccache and
# not SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED.
RUSTC_WRAPPER: "sccache"
# RUSTC_WRAPPER: "sccache"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why remove?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cause the net benefit in this case is 0 and it would take me more time to make it work for windows.

Windows is not set up the same way so it starts complaining. Instead of doing a custom unset for windows or separate job, simply disabling it works as well.
These are jobs that are only rarely run manually and on tagged releases. They run with a different build profile so those caches we have from PRs are worth nothing in this case, might even be net negative where it pushes out some of those deps. By the time we do a follow up release, the deps are incredibly stale and most likely pushed out due to storage limits.

@Arqu Arqu added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 1, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 4abb782 Feb 1, 2024
18 checks passed
fubuloubu pushed a commit to ApeWorX/iroh that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
## Description

After the initial merge of n0-computer#1987
made some fixes.

## Notes & open questions

<!-- Any notes, remarks or open questions you have to make about the PR.
-->

## Change checklist

- [x] Self-review.
- [ ] Documentation updates if relevant.
- [ ] Tests if relevant.
matheus23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
## Description

After the initial merge of #1987
made some fixes.

## Notes & open questions

<!-- Any notes, remarks or open questions you have to make about the PR.
-->

## Change checklist

- [x] Self-review.
- [ ] Documentation updates if relevant.
- [ ] Tests if relevant.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants