Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): add name to tests step #1938

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2024
Merged

chore(ci): add name to tests step #1938

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2024

Conversation

Arqu
Copy link
Collaborator

@Arqu Arqu commented Jan 8, 2024

Description

Seems like the lack of job name makes it invisible on the branch protections, hence can't make the step required for the nested runs. Raw Tests job is available. This is just theory for now.

Notes & open questions

Change checklist

  • Self-review.
  • Documentation updates if relevant.
  • Tests if relevant.

@Arqu Arqu self-assigned this Jan 8, 2024
@Arqu Arqu added the ci continous integration label Jan 8, 2024
@Arqu Arqu force-pushed the arqu/named_ci_step branch from 5a7f9fc to 5a3e09c Compare January 8, 2024 12:45
@Arqu Arqu merged commit 51cf6ed into main Jan 8, 2024
3 of 27 checks passed
@Arqu Arqu deleted the arqu/named_ci_step branch January 8, 2024 12:47
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ env:

jobs:
tests:
name: CI Test Suite
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fwiw since this is used directly in the UI the horizontal space matters. I'd have made it tests to keep the same.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fwiw since this is used directly in the UI the horizontal space matters. I'd have made it tests to keep the same.

Agree, I just took something else as it overlaps with test / Tests and GH UI is confusing around these. I'll make an issue and revise on another pass.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah yeah. that branch protection UI is pretty rubbish too :(

fubuloubu pushed a commit to ApeWorX/iroh that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
## Description

Seems like the lack of job name makes it invisible on the branch
protections, hence can't make the step required for the nested runs. Raw
`Tests` job is available. This is just theory for now.

## Notes & open questions

<!-- Any notes, remarks or open questions you have to make about the PR.
-->

## Change checklist

- [ ] Self-review.
- [ ] Documentation updates if relevant.
- [ ] Tests if relevant.
matheus23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
## Description

Seems like the lack of job name makes it invisible on the branch
protections, hence can't make the step required for the nested runs. Raw
`Tests` job is available. This is just theory for now.

## Notes & open questions

<!-- Any notes, remarks or open questions you have to make about the PR.
-->

## Change checklist

- [ ] Self-review.
- [ ] Documentation updates if relevant.
- [ ] Tests if relevant.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci continous integration
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants