Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test suite failing with citgm #3240

Closed
MylesBorins opened this issue Feb 12, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #4354
Closed

Test suite failing with citgm #3240

MylesBorins opened this issue Feb 12, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #4354
Labels
area: node.js command-line-or-Node.js-specific

Comments

@MylesBorins
Copy link

Seems to be something to do with the way you use node-gyp. Doesn't seem to matter which version of node or npm... but I haven't dug in too much yet

to repro

npm i -g citgm
citgm -v verbose mocha
@Bamieh
Copy link
Contributor

Bamieh commented Feb 12, 2018

Hey @MylesBorins, can you submit the verbose log in here?

@Bamieh Bamieh added unconfirmed-bug area: node.js command-line-or-Node.js-specific labels Feb 12, 2018
@outsideris
Copy link
Contributor

In my machine, it looks fine.

info:    passing module(s)   |
info:    module name:        | mocha
info:    version:            | 5.0.0
info:    done                | The smoke test has passed.
info:    duration            | test duration: 175293ms

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Author

5.0.1 is now passing locally for me. It was possible failures were due to workign on a pre-releasae version of node

Still having issues in CI

20:36:37 error:                     | CI mode disabled 

https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker-nobuild/238/MACHINE=ubuntu1604-64/console

@Bamieh
Copy link
Contributor

Bamieh commented Feb 22, 2018

@MylesBorins is this still happening buddy? can you guide me on how to reproduce this so i can debug it?

Cheers!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: node.js command-line-or-Node.js-specific
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants