[InstCombine] Fold comparison of integers by parts

Let's say you represent (i32, i32) as an i64 from which the parts
are extracted with lshr/trunc. Then, if you compare two tuples by
parts you get something like A[0] == B[0] && A[1] == B[1], just
that the part extraction happens by lshr/trunc and not a narrow
load or similar.

The fold implemented here reduces such equality comparisons by
converting them into a comparison on a larger part of the integer
(which might be the whole integer). It handles both the "and of eq"
and the conjugated "or of ne" case.

I'm being conservative with one-use for now, though this could be
relaxed if profitable (the base pattern converts 11 instructions
into 5 instructions, but there's quite a few variations on how it
can play out).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101232

llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp

@@ -1076,6 +1076,87 @@ static Value *foldUnsignedUnderflowCheck(ICmpInst *ZeroICmp,
   return nullptr;
 }
 
+struct IntPart {
+  Value *From;
+  unsigned StartBit;
+  unsigned NumBits;
+};
+
+/// Match an extraction of bits from an integer.
+static Optional<IntPart> matchIntPart(Value *V) {
+  Value *X;
+  if (!match(V, m_OneUse(m_Trunc(m_Value(X)))))
+    return None;
+
+  unsigned NumOriginalBits = X->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits();
+  unsigned NumExtractedBits = V->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits();
+  Value *Y;
+  const APInt *Shift;
+  // For a trunc(lshr Y, Shift) pattern, make sure we're only extracting bits
+  // from Y, not any shifted-in zeroes.
+  if (match(X, m_OneUse(m_LShr(m_Value(Y), m_APInt(Shift)))) &&
+      Shift->ule(NumOriginalBits - NumExtractedBits))
+    return {{Y, (unsigned)Shift->getZExtValue(), NumExtractedBits}};
+  return {{X, 0, NumExtractedBits}};
+}
+
+/// Materialize an extraction of bits from an integer in IR.
+static Value *extractIntPart(const IntPart &P, IRBuilderBase &Builder) {
+  Value *V = P.From;
+  if (P.StartBit)
+    V = Builder.CreateLShr(V, P.StartBit);
+  Type *TruncTy = V->getType()->getWithNewBitWidth(P.NumBits);
+  if (TruncTy != V->getType())
+    V = Builder.CreateTrunc(V, TruncTy);
+  return V;
+}
+
+/// (icmp eq X0, Y0) & (icmp eq X1, Y1) -> icmp eq X01, Y01
+/// (icmp ne X0, Y0) | (icmp ne X1, Y1) -> icmp ne X01, Y01
+/// where X0, X1 and Y0, Y1 are adjacent parts extracted from an integer.
+static Value *foldEqOfParts(ICmpInst *Cmp0, ICmpInst *Cmp1, bool IsAnd,
+                            InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) {
+  if (!Cmp0->hasOneUse() || !Cmp1->hasOneUse())
+    return nullptr;
+
+  CmpInst::Predicate Pred = IsAnd ? CmpInst::ICMP_EQ : CmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+  if (Cmp0->getPredicate() != Pred || Cmp1->getPredicate() != Pred)
+    return nullptr;
+
+  Optional<IntPart> L0 = matchIntPart(Cmp0->getOperand(0));
+  Optional<IntPart> R0 = matchIntPart(Cmp0->getOperand(1));
+  Optional<IntPart> L1 = matchIntPart(Cmp1->getOperand(0));
+  Optional<IntPart> R1 = matchIntPart(Cmp1->getOperand(1));
+  if (!L0 || !R0 || !L1 || !R1)
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // Make sure the LHS/RHS compare a part of the same value, possibly after
+  // an operand swap.
+  if (L0->From != L1->From || R0->From != R1->From) {
+    if (L0->From != R1->From || R0->From != L1->From)
+      return nullptr;
+    std::swap(L1, R1);
+  }
+
+  // Make sure the extracted parts are adjacent, canonicalizing to L0/R0 being
+  // the low part and L1/R1 being the high part.
+  if (L0->StartBit + L0->NumBits != L1->StartBit ||
+      R0->StartBit + R0->NumBits != R1->StartBit) {
+    if (L1->StartBit + L1->NumBits != L0->StartBit ||
+        R1->StartBit + R1->NumBits != R0->StartBit)
+      return nullptr;
+    std::swap(L0, L1);
+    std::swap(R0, R1);
+  }
+
+  // We can simplify to a comparison of these larger parts of the integers.
+  IntPart L = {L0->From, L0->StartBit, L0->NumBits + L1->NumBits};
+  IntPart R = {R0->From, R0->StartBit, R0->NumBits + R1->NumBits};
+  Value *LValue = extractIntPart(L, Builder);
+  Value *RValue = extractIntPart(R, Builder);
+  return Builder.CreateICmp(Pred, LValue, RValue);
+}
+
 /// Reduce logic-of-compares with equality to a constant by substituting a
 /// common operand with the constant. Callers are expected to call this with
 /// Cmp0/Cmp1 switched to handle logic op commutativity.
@@ -1181,6 +1262,9 @@ Value *InstCombinerImpl::foldAndOfICmps(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS,
           foldUnsignedUnderflowCheck(RHS, LHS, /*IsAnd=*/true, Q, Builder))
     return X;
 
+  if (Value *X = foldEqOfParts(LHS, RHS, /*IsAnd=*/true, Builder))
+    return X;
+
   // This only handles icmp of constants: (icmp1 A, C1) & (icmp2 B, C2).
   Value *LHS0 = LHS->getOperand(0), *RHS0 = RHS->getOperand(0);
 
@@ -2411,6 +2495,9 @@ Value *InstCombinerImpl::foldOrOfICmps(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS,
           foldUnsignedUnderflowCheck(RHS, LHS, /*IsAnd=*/false, Q, Builder))
     return X;
 
+  if (Value *X = foldEqOfParts(LHS, RHS, /*IsAnd=*/false, Builder))
+    return X;
+
   // (icmp ne A, 0) | (icmp ne B, 0) --> (icmp ne (A|B), 0)
   // TODO: Remove this when foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps can handle vectors.
   if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && match(LHS1, m_Zero()) &&