You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In terms of #311 it was revealed that OWSLib represents Booleans as {0, 1} of type Integer. At this point the workaround was to skip Booleans in all WMS endpoints, but in the future we may want to use these extra parameters.
This task is to track the status of this issue. That was an appropriate OWSLib restriction for the WMS 1.1.x, but it could be legitimate to represent Booleans as strings ("true" / "false") in terms of the WMS 1.3.x.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It looks like the majority of libraries work with WMS Booleans as with 0 and 1 (QGIS is an example of such library). I think it makes sense for us to force {0, 1} usage for all WMS endpoints.
In terms of #311 it was revealed that
OWSLib
representsBooleans
as{0, 1}
of typeInteger
. At this point the workaround was to skip Booleans in all WMS endpoints, but in the future we may want to use these extra parameters.This task is to track the status of this issue. That was an appropriate
OWSLib
restriction for the WMS 1.1.x, but it could be legitimate to represent Booleans as strings ("true" / "false") in terms of the WMS 1.3.x.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: