Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: added service entry for sentinel port on headless pods #56

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

JoeHCQ1
Copy link
Contributor

@JoeHCQ1 JoeHCQ1 commented Dec 3, 2024

Description

This allows sentinels to be listed individually and accessed that way by the client rather than being behind the service. GitLab didn't work when accessing via the service, but did work when hitting the nodes directly.

This has been tested in that it's the version of the package I deployed locally for testing the integration with GitLab.

Related Issue

defenseunicorns/uds-bundle-software-factory-nutanix#220

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist before merging

@JoeHCQ1 JoeHCQ1 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2024 17:31
@Racer159 Racer159 merged commit 2dcd8cc into main Dec 3, 2024
11 checks passed
Racer159 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[8.0.1-uds.2](v8.0.1-uds.1...v8.0.1-uds.2)
(2024-12-03)


### Bug Fixes

* added service entry for sentinel port on headless pods
([#56](#56))
([2dcd8cc](2dcd8cc))


### Miscellaneous

* **deps:** update valkey package dependencies
([#38](#38))
([f49beaf](f49beaf))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](/~https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](/~https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants