Emphasize the necessity of enabling file backend #2483
Conversation
nmengin
added
area/documentation
area/provider/file
status/2-needs-review
and removed
status/0-needs-triage
labels
docs/configuration/backends/file.md
Outdated
| @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ You have three choices: | |||
| - [Rules in a Separate File](/configuration/backends/file/#rules-in-a-separate-file) | |||
| - [Multiple `.toml` Files](/configuration/backends/file/#multiple-toml-files) | |||
|
|
|||
| To enable the file backend, you must either pass `--file` option to Træfik binary or put `[file]` section (with or without inner settings) in the configuration file. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[...] either pass --file option to Traefik binary or put [file] section [...]
->
[...] either pass the --file option to the Traefik binary or put the [file] section [...]
(Emphasis by me.)
|
@mvasin would you mind rebasing your PR against the |
|
@timoreimann Could you please patiently guide me on what should I do next? I have those three commits, with the |
|
@mvasin nothing needed from your end anymore. Just lean back and watch our bot do the dirty work once the approval process has completed. 😀 |
|
Ah sorry, just realized the rebase hasn't happened yet. |
|
Do you mind if either I or @ldez do the rebase for you? |
|
@timoreimann Sure, I don't. :) |
|
I will do the job 👍 |
|
@ldez beat you to it. :) |
|
@mvasin Thank you for this. I'd spent quite some time trying to get the file backend to work because of the same reason. |
What does this PR do?
Clarifies the necessity of enabling a backend.
Motivation
It's not obvious that the presence of empty [file] table means something; I spent quite some time trying to make the simplest file backend configuration work and only slack suggestions helped.