Remove dxtbx procrunner dependency #640
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There is no longer any reason to use procrunner in place of built-in subprocess
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #640 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 39.38% 39.38%
=======================================
Files 178 178
Lines 15495 15495
Branches 2613 2613
=======================================
Hits 6103 6103
Misses 8832 8832
Partials 560 560 |
|
yay |
toastisme
pushed a commit
to toastisme/dxtbx
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2024
There is no longer any reason to use procrunner in place of built-in subprocess
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is no longer any reason to use procrunner in place of built-in subprocess