Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RSL4 #96

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jan 15, 2016
Merged

RSL4 #96

merged 17 commits into from
Jan 15, 2016

Conversation

ricardopereira
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

expect(message.content() as? NSObject).to(equal(fixtureMessage["data"].object as? NSObject))
}
}
}
}
}

// RSL4a
it("RSL4a") {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mattheworiordan What do you think? I need to add something to check the sent data.

@mattheworiordan
Copy link
Member

Really good progress, however we need to get the tests passing now as opposed to moving on and leaving more TODO / FIXME items in the list.

@mattheworiordan
Copy link
Member

Thanks, looks very good, few small comments, but 👍

@ricardopereira
Copy link
Contributor Author

Needs #122.

Payloads must be binary, strings, or objects capable of JSON
representation, or can be empty (omitted). Any other data type should
not be permitted and an exception should be raised
Something is wrong with NSDictionary and NSArray.
RSL4d3 is unfinished because the payload is different from the expected
behaviour
 -  Avoid comparing the JSON string because `NSJSONSerialization` could
change the arguments order.
@ricardopereira
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased

@mattheworiordan
Copy link
Member

Ok, have the comments been addressed? Hard to tell as old history is gone, if so, I think we should merge. @tcard do you agree?

@ricardopereira
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, all comments addressed.

@mattheworiordan
Copy link
Member

@tcard please merge if you are happy then

@@ -317,6 +326,9 @@ - (ARTStatus *)decode:(ARTPayload *)payload output:(ARTPayload *__autoreleasing

@end


// MARK: Cipher
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is MARK?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It helps with the Show Document Items:
screen_shot_2016-01-14_at_12_35_34

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nice.

@mattheworiordan
Copy link
Member

Aside from @tcard's feedback, looks good

@tcard
Copy link
Contributor

tcard commented Jan 15, 2016

LGTM

ricardopereira added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2016
@ricardopereira ricardopereira merged commit b537e98 into master Jan 15, 2016
@ricardopereira ricardopereira deleted the RSL4 branch January 15, 2016 11:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants