RSC1: Add token string constructor.

[tcard]

No description provided.

[ricardopereira]

If you just need a token you can use getTestToken from test suite.

[mattheworiordan]

Should we not be initialising with just a token i.e. ARTRest(tokenDetails.token) as well?

[tcard]

@ricardopereira Good point. Will do.

Sorry @mattheworiordan , I don't know what you mean. What you say is how it looks like now (except for the named parameter).

[mattheworiordan]

In other languages we have an overloaded constructor so that you can pass in just a token or API key string, or options. If this is not possible in iOS then it's absolutely fine, but if it is possible it's a nice touch.

[tcard]

It can be done, but it's strongly anti-idiomatic. All constructors that take arguments are like initWithSomething:something. So we have initWithOptions, initWithToken, initWithKey.

[tcard]

(Note that Swift automatically removes the "With", but still requires a named argument.)

[ricardopereira]

The conversion removes the initWith:

Objective-C initializers begin with init, or initWith: if the initializer takes one or more arguments. When an Objective-C initializer is imported by Swift, the init prefix becomes an init keyword to indicate that the method is a Swift initializer. If the initializer takes an argument, the With is removed and the rest of the selector is divided up into named parameters accordingly.
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/Swift/Conceptual/BuildingCocoaApps/InteractingWithObjective-CAPIs.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40014216-CH4-ID35

[ricardopereira]

Only the designated initialiser can be used like ARTRest(value). Right now, I think the default initialiser is initWithLogger:andOptions.

[tcard]

If you just need a token you can use getTestToken from test suite.

Done at 3fd9a731ec4a1490c7c11ecbc9b22195f60ac1de

[mattheworiordan]

LGTM

[ricardopereira]

LGTM