Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Swift Package Manager badges to README.md #1204

Closed
lukasz-szyszkowski opened this issue Nov 3, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1205
Closed

Add Swift Package Manager badges to README.md #1204

lukasz-szyszkowski opened this issue Nov 3, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1205

Comments

@lukasz-szyszkowski
Copy link
Contributor

lukasz-szyszkowski commented Nov 3, 2021

Add info badges about Swift Compatibility and Platform Compatibility to README.md

https://swiftpackageindex.com/ably/ably-cocoa/information-for-package-maintainers

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Uncategorised by Unito

@QuintinWillison
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds like a good idea to me. Thanks.

@smhk
Copy link

smhk commented May 5, 2024

Guys, no iPhone project and no library or platform now uses "cocoa pods" or "carthage". Your quick start documentation on the ably homepage still talks about "cocoa pods" and does not even mention SPM. (I wasted 15 minutes trying to find out if you actually have an SPM.)

It's not 1950 - would it be wise to drop all mention of "pods" and "carthage" certainly from the main web site doco and perhaps from git?

The situation is very confusing and "out of date". My colleague sitting next to me glanced at this, said "what are they doing monkeying with pods" and he moved on and will never try ably.

Maybe you have few apple users, IDK

Again in short it was frustrating to see historic systems mentione on the main "quick start" on the web page, and a waste of 15 minutes. Anyway hope it helps

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants