CCT5010-0001 was sold under the name 550B1012 in Denmark

[poizan42]

Adding as white label model for lack of a better place. It was sold as a fully first-party product, albeit with additional "Lauritz Knudsen by Schneider Electric" branding.

Originally made as a PR to zigbee2mqtt.io: zigbee2mqtt.io#3351:

Not sure exactly how we usually document multiple model numbers for the same hardware when it's not quite a white label situation. It was sold with both Schneider Electric and "LK" (Lauritz Knudsen) branding on the device (see https://www.lk.dk/produkter/550B1012/wiser-tradlos-lysdaemper-for-indbygning-puck)

They exists as two different products in Schneider Electric's catalog

* https://www.se.com/dk/da/product/CCT5010-0001/connected-dimmer-wiser-micro-module/

* https://www.se.com/dk/da/product/550B1012/wiser-tr%C3%A5dl%C3%B8s-lysd%C3%A6mper-for-indbygning-puck/

• but their "dimmer guide" makes it clear that they are in fact the same product with two different SKUs (or CRs whatever that means):

[poizan42]

Actually there is precedence for adding multiple model numbers from the same vendor directly to model:

zigbee-herdsman-converters/src/devices/schneider_electric.ts

Line 689 in fe08be8

model: 'CCT5011-0001/CCT5011-0002/MEG5011-0001',

[poizan42]

Ugh, would it be possible to make the CI scripts actually print what prettier is unhappy about? I'm not really into the whole node ecosystem, but I couldn't see anything obvious from the documentation. Maybe it could call prettier with --write and print out the unified diff between working copy and PR branch?

I will try to set up a node development environment when I have the time to figure out what the problem is, but it feels like a bit of high barrier to just update some documentation :/

[Koenkk]

Thanks!