New documentation for compile-time lists #986
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5 tasks
|
Reopening. I will need to update the naming to match dlang/phobos#3265 and dlang/phobos#3264 but documentation itself shouldn't change a lot. Ping @WalterBright |
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| $(P `T` here is variadic $(LINK2 template.html#TemplateArgumentList, template argument list) | ||
| which is a core language feature. It is has own very special semantics |
|
@CyberShadow ctarguments.html does not appear in the documentation auto tester, so it is difficult to review DDoc and formatting. |
|
@JinShil okay to pull this now so you can submit edits as a separate PR? |
|
It's |
andralex
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2015
New documentation for compile-time lists
|
done |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Intended to be merged after dlang/phobos#3128
and replace existing http://dlang.org/tuple
After that http://dlang.org/tuple can be rewritten to explain usage of
std.typecons.Tuplein moredetails and provide reference about historical naming reasons.
I am very sloppy with DDOC so any advice in improving formatting and style is very welcome