TSC Meeting notes 2019-10-24

Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>

ASWF/tsc-meetings/2019-10-24.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+# 10/17/2019
+
+### Attending:
+
+* Cary Phillips
+* Christina Tempelaar-Lietz
+* Kimball Thurston
+* Joseph Goldstone
+* Peter Hillman
+* Nick Porcino
+* Larry Gritz
+* John Mertic
+
+### Discussion:
+
+
+Discussion:
+
+* ASWF Project Adoption Proposal has been sent to the TAC. Next steps:
+  wait a few days for comments, then solicit a vote by the TAC, the
+  put the motion to the ASWF board, hopefully within a week.
+
+* Once adoption is complete, the next step is to move the repo to the
+  ASWF GitHu organization.
+
+* Larry created RB-2.4 branch, in preparation for 2.4 patch
+  releases. He uses this naming scheme for OIIO, etc, seems a
+  reasonable convention to follow.  The branch markers are where
+  changes go; release tags (e.g. v2.4.1) are for actual releases, once
+  they're cut.
+
+* We'll resolve to discuss at the first TSC meeting of every month
+  whether enough fixes have gone into the patch branch to warrant a
+  patch release. Using the GitHub process, the overhead is low.
+
+* We need to configure Azure to run on RB-2.4, upon merge.
+
+* Kimball noted that his distro, Arch Linux, has updated to v2.4.0.
+
+* Larry reports that he's been integrating 2.4.0 into other projects
+  and it's been going well, build files are working as expected.
+
+* Adam Ferrall-Nunge at ILM had a problem with python2_7/imath.so not
+  getting installed by “make install” Let sit for discussion on TAC,
+  will pass it on the private list Should be #ifdef, not $if HAVE_FOO,
+  not strong opinion.
+
+* Nick noted inconsistencies between #if HAVE_FOO v. #ifdef
+  HAVE_FOO. By the current practice, we should probably prefer #ifdef
+  over #if.
+
+* Discussion of specific issues is recorded in the GitHub Issues:
+
+  * [#597](/~https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/597) solution is to
+    check in the generated .h's to the repo, with make targets to
+    generate them.
+
+  * [#595](/~https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/595)
+    [#593](/~https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/593)
+    [#592](/~https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/592) seems to all
+    be a problem with pkg-config files. Kimball to investigate.
+
+  * [#591](/~https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/591) fix is to
+    strip out C++98 copatibility code, rely solely on C++11 threads.
+
+  * [#583](/~https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/583) CMake seems to
+    be confused by something in the local boost installation, not sure
+    what to do.
+
+  * [#581](/~https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/581) Remove
+    IlmMisc.h from distribution.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+