Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
TSC meeting notes from 7/25/2019
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>
  • Loading branch information
cary-ilm authored and kdt3rd committed Aug 10, 2019
1 parent f5ab817 commit 2ebd7ad
Showing 1 changed file with 69 additions and 0 deletions.
69 changes: 69 additions & 0 deletions ASWF/tsc-meetings/2019-07-25.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
# 7/25/2019

### Attending:

* Cary Phillips
* Peter Hillman
* Kimball Thurston
* Larry Gritz
* Christina Tempelaar-Lietz
* Rod Bogart
* Emily Olin

### Agenda

* Prep for SIGGRAPH BoF. Draft of slides is here:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1mxzp6jn2zuHAyahzwhocwRTpoenNqO-LEvPUvS7gDww/edit?usp=sharing

* Prep for 2.4 release.

### Discussion

* When the repo moves to the ASWF organization, we'll make it
"OpenEXR". Capitalization isn't consistent across ASWF projects, but
we prefer it this over "openexr".

* SIGGRAPH BoF prep:

* Preable about the ASWF and recent progress should be brief; most
time should be reserved for the discussion. And the topics should
be presented as "community issues", raised by the community for
discussion within the community, facilitated by the TSC. These are
not plans to be executed by the TSC, the TSC is merely a
gatekeeper.

* Imath proposal:

* Half should have #define/#ifdef so that when included with CUDA half.h, the first one wins.

* Peter's part ordering standard/documentation should be a proposal to go into a 3.0 release.

* The need for a "tiny" EXR implementation? Because there are
numerous divergent ones out there; rumored examples at Apple,
Intel, and a part of ffmpeg, instigated by several factors:

1. People building OpenEXR get to the b44 log table build stage and say, WTF?!?

2. There is no option to build the library without exceptions, a
deal-breaker for platforms/compilers that don't support
exceptions, and a turn-off for many others.

3. You need a PhD in CMake to get it to build.

4. For many people, the write-it-yourself threshold is quite low.

* There are people who choose not to use the library. We should
listen to them, even if they're not in the VFX industry. OpenEXR
is widely used; we have an obligation to be stewards outside of
just the film industry.

* Release prep:

* Windows build is not quite working. There are still problems with boost.

* Windows tests are failing.

* Issues:

* #445 should not go into 2.4. It needs a more thorough analysis, and wider testing.

0 comments on commit 2ebd7ad

Please sign in to comment.