-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suppporting authorization_scopes #61
Comments
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 30 days |
This issue was automatically closed because of stale in 10 days |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
This issue has been resolved in version 5.0.0 🎉 |
Is your request related to a new offering from AWS?
No
Describe the solution you'd like.
#17 added support for
authorization_type
andauthorizer_id
but left a commented out block forauthorization_scopes
. I started digging into seeing what it might take to enable that an ran into a problem since var.integrations is defined as a map(any) and Terraform is erroring with a type constraint because authorization_scopes wants a set of strings.Looking over the documentation around map(any) it's not obvious to me how to pass in a set via the integrations map without violating the type constraint but perhaps I'm misunderstanding the problem. I started to work on a fork with a var integrations type = map(object({})) but I wanted to reach out here to see what the projects thoughts were on supporting
authorization_scopes
first.Thank you!
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: