Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FUT090 (99 group dual-white/rgb) support #209

Open
duststorm opened this issue Jan 25, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

FUT090 (99 group dual-white/rgb) support #209

duststorm opened this issue Jan 25, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@duststorm
Copy link

I wonder, has anyone investigated the protocol the FUT090 remote (RGB+CCT with 99 channels) uses?
Would be interesting if this project would support it.

More info on the remote: http://futlight.com/productdetails.aspx?id=225&typeid=143

@sidoh
Copy link
Owner

sidoh commented Jan 26, 2018

Currently there is not support for this protocol. It's been a while since I looked, but I'm pretty sure it uses different channels and syncwords. We'd need to sniff SPI on a remote to get these.

I'm also pretty sure there aren't all that many devices that support this protocol. Certainly happy to look at it if folks would find it useful, and if there's someone who can help out getting the RF channels and syncwords.

@sidoh sidoh changed the title FUT090 support FUT090 (99 group dual-white/rgb) support May 31, 2018
@sidoh
Copy link
Owner

sidoh commented May 31, 2018

Radio configs reversed via SPI:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eMNn5HmMzNc0LgRBQlcnDYeE7KKCKBPMd15dMbIpqfM/edit#gid=0

Same as FUT092 (4 group rgb+cct) actually, except that packets are 11 bytes instead of 9 bytes. Not getting picked up right now, but might just be some cruddy code in the nRF handler.

@human101010
Copy link

I have some of these remotes and the compatible lights (the moving RGBW ones). It would be super useful to control them from an esp8266.

Any chance of support being added? I'm very happy to help with testing, sniffing commands, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants