We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I am wondering if #398 is this the right way to go.
Current gemspec is error prone as the files are listed explicitly instead of generated on the fly.
It is also confusing that json_pure.gemspec is generated automatically and not json.gemspec.
json_pure.gemspec
json.gemspec
Either #398 is reverted (and control character?? fixed) or else the gemspec should be cleaned up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In last year, I have not a owner grant of json_pure. Now, I can release json and json_pure. We will replace json_pure.gemspec same as json.gemspec.
json_pure
json
Sorry, something went wrong.
@marcandre I think the current gemspecs have no issues. So, I will close this.
No branches or pull requests
I am wondering if #398 is this the right way to go.
Current gemspec is error prone as the files are listed explicitly instead of generated on the fly.
It is also confusing that
json_pure.gemspec
is generated automatically and notjson.gemspec
.Either #398 is reverted (and control character?? fixed) or else the gemspec should be cleaned up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: