You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Two adjacent cells in different countries cannot both be unused by the loop.
But in the example errors, there is a different definition:
The cells that is not passed any line are adjacent over border line.
These rules are equivalent if there are no extra edges inside an area, but things are different if there are extra edges inside an area, where the latter definition is stronger than the former one. For example, there is a puzzle found in the database:
From the implementation of pzprjs, we can know that pzprjs takes the latter definition. Therefore, is it possible to alter the former definition to remove the ambiguity?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the 4th rule of country road, it says:
But in the example errors, there is a different definition:
These rules are equivalent if there are no extra edges inside an area, but things are different if there are extra edges inside an area, where the latter definition is stronger than the former one. For example, there is a puzzle found in the database:
From the implementation of
pzprjs
, we can know thatpzprjs
takes the latter definition. Therefore, is it possible to alter the former definition to remove the ambiguity?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: