Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback buttons for individual muplis should have granular reasons for feedback which can be auto-sorted #568

Open
NathanHawks opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 10 comments

Comments

@NathanHawks
Copy link

NathanHawks commented Dec 1, 2021

Suggest a drop-down menu of the following reasons for feedback and (if doable) a sorting system in Github issues to auto-assign priority based on what reason was chosen:

high priority

  • malgli / literal translation of an idiom
  • troll entry
  • invalid syntax
  • missing or wrong SE/FA
  • abstraction necessary/unnecessary / tu'a usable but not used

middle priority

  • more verbose than necessary using CLL+BPFK
  • amateurish

low priority

  • experimental words/dialects could make this simpler
@lagleki
Copy link
Owner

lagleki commented Dec 1, 2021

Can you take a look at tags in live muplis and add necessary one here?

@NathanHawks
Copy link
Author

NathanHawks commented Dec 1, 2021

Can you take a look at tags in live muplis and add necessary one here?

Link please

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Md0pojdcO3EVf3LQPHXFB7uOThNvTWszkWd5T4YhvKs/edit#gid=94847073

(for easy access later)

@NathanHawks
Copy link
Author

Also I don't really understand this request

@NathanHawks
Copy link
Author

Are you asking me to add my tags as a 3rd cell under "how?" e.g. cell 8B on the first sheet?

image

@lagleki
Copy link
Owner

lagleki commented Dec 1, 2021

Ye. I need a full list of possible tags

@NathanHawks
Copy link
Author

image

If I think of additional tags I will edit 8B to reflect

@NathanHawks
Copy link
Author

NathanHawks commented Dec 1, 2021

"X" overlap fixed, changed to "XG"

image

@NathanHawks
Copy link
Author

T-- overlap also fixed

@lagleki
Copy link
Owner

lagleki commented Dec 1, 2021 via email

@NathanHawks
Copy link
Author

NathanHawks commented Dec 1, 2021

G (good)
G− (a little good, not so good)
G+ (very good)
A (acceptable)
B- (a little bad)
B+ (very bad)
N (neologism, containing an undocumented Lojban word)
E (experimental grammar)
P (non-conventional punctuation)
C (CLL style)
X (xorlo)
W (play on words and thus poorly translatable to/from Lojban)
EB (the English original is broken so no fixes to the Lojban translation are possible)
J (the sentence is a joke)
M- (malgli / literal translation of an idiom)
T- (troll entry)
S- (syntax error)
SF- (missing or wrong SE/FA)
AB- (missing/unnecessary abstraction/tu'a usable but not used)
V (more verbose than necessary under CLL+BPFK)
F- (amateurish)
XG (could be simpler using experimental grammar/words)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants