You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
tsaglam opened this issue
Mar 31, 2023
· 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bugIssue/PR that involves a buglanguagePR / Issue deals (partly) with new and/or existing languages for JPlagminorMinor issue/feature/contribution/change
Some of the similar regions reported in my batch of 125 Python3 files are, for lack of a better word, backwards. For example, the first of the 3 in the report below, which was the 'worst' case, with 96% reported matching:
Clicking on the Green or Brown region entries scrolls to a correspondingly coloured region of code in the two file listing columns.
Clicking on the Orange region entry goes nowhere (on first attempt) or to the 'beginning' of the region, i.e. 292/287, but no lines are coloured Orange...
The user used a basecode submission, and the problem stems from the core, not the report viewer. However, whether it stems from the report generation or the comparison algorithm is unclear.
Contact @tsaglam if you want to reproduce this issue.
Sidenote: The symptoms are resolved by #971, but we should still find out where this comes from.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tsaglam
added
bug
Issue/PR that involves a bug
minor
Minor issue/feature/contribution/change
language
PR / Issue deals (partly) with new and/or existing languages for JPlag
labels
Mar 31, 2023
The error is cause by the python language module. The METHOD_END, ass well as CLASS_END, is reported with the line of the method (or class) begin. See JplagPython3Listener.java.
There is no direct connection to the base code feature, this happens if the last token of a match has an earlier line associated with it.
bugIssue/PR that involves a buglanguagePR / Issue deals (partly) with new and/or existing languages for JPlagminorMinor issue/feature/contribution/change
From an email we received:
The user used a basecode submission, and the problem stems from the core, not the report viewer. However, whether it stems from the report generation or the comparison algorithm is unclear.
Contact @tsaglam if you want to reproduce this issue.
Sidenote: The symptoms are resolved by #971, but we should still find out where this comes from.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: