Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

Questions #7

Closed
trdwll opened this issue May 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Questions #7

trdwll opened this issue May 7, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@trdwll
Copy link

trdwll commented May 7, 2015

Will the search/find form be implemented by default again?
Making custom lexer highlights via xml?

BUG
When displaying line numbers and you have alot in the editor, it messes up the numbers and doesn't display them fully. (Lines 1-100 show then 1000+ shows 000 etc)

@jacobslusser
Copy link
Owner

Will the search/find form be implemented by default again? See issue #4. My personal feeling is that these dialogs are application-specific and not well suited for inclusion in the ScintillaNET core library. However, my suggestion was that if there was sufficient demand a separate ScintillaNET.Extensions library might be created (or community driven).
Making custom lexer highlights via xml? See issue #5. I don't currently have plans to define lexer settings via XML, but I'm not particularly opposed to a simple "load style definitions from XML" method.

From the description of your bug it sounds like your line numbers margin width is not automatically adjusting and when the number of characters is > 3, it is getting cut off. If that is the case you can find instructions in the project README.md for automatically adjusting the margin width in the section "Displaying Line Numbers".

@trdwll
Copy link
Author

trdwll commented May 8, 2015

Thanks for the response. I just recently found this newer version if ScintillaNET, and it's looking promising. Keep up the great work! :D

@trdwll trdwll closed this as completed May 8, 2015
GerHobbelt pushed a commit to GerHobbelt/ScintillaNET that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2021
Added missing methods SCI_SETTABINDENTS & SCI_SETBACKSPACEUNINDENTS
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants